Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> > > > Hello Rainer,
> > > > 
> > > >  > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has
> > > >  > worked intensively on the pkg updates.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@.
> > > 
> > > Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with
> > > unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look.
> > > 
> > > I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround that
> > > works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be useful
> > > to other people as a work around.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
> > 
> > at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it next week
> > 
> > Bapt
> > 
> 
> After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a need for
> After a deeper analysis:
> 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the
> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version.
> 
> I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for people not
> using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regarding the :32
> handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere).
> 
> I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am.
> 
> For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is tracking 32
> bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking base
> libraries always.
> 
> After a deeper analysis:
> My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would work ok as
> if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase.
> 
> What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to consider them
> as provided.
> 
> Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgbase, will
> scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am interesting
> in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d unhappy)
> 
> Best regards,
> Bapt
> 

And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit livraries, so
everything should be fine.