Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>>>>> Hello Rainer,
>>>>>
>>>>>   > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has
>>>>>   > worked intensively on the pkg updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@.
>>>>
>>>> Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with
>>>> unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look.
>>>>
>>>> I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround that
>>>> works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be useful
>>>> to other people as a work around.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
>>>
>>> at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it next week
>>>
>>> Bapt
>>>
>>
>> After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a need for
>> After a deeper analysis:
>> 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the
>> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version.
>>
>> I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for people not
>> using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regarding the :32
>> handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere).
>>
>> I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am.
>>
>> For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is tracking 32
>> bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking base
>> libraries always.
>>
>> After a deeper analysis:
>> My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would work ok as
>> if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase.
>>
>> What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to consider them
>> as provided.
>>
>> Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgbase, will
>> scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am interesting
>> in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d unhappy)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bapt
>>
> 
> And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit livraries, so
> everything should be fine.

Bapt, thanks for the analysis.

SO I gather I need to rebuild my jails from scratch, possibly from 
pkgbase, but I'm not sure what I can do about my head jail which I build 
from source, and do also use to generate pkgbase packages for my 
desktops/laptop etc.

Or maybe I'm completely missing the point.

-- 
Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>