From nobody Sat Feb 01 21:56:36 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Ylmn857F7z5m69l for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 21:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ylmn803qKz3gfc; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 21:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1738447004; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DhQNDfQmOz7AYcWY5I0MUwErFoevQ4eSVsQemx5l8sU=; b=ycWCRITIwgkicMdgmMs8IC5gS+9YsX/RIkbKeQE1Yq9Dmph0bQY0av6qei0NkWRGBNhRIb Z8+WJTqx8kY+1ZAjE81JeItkgw7N6U3XwCiJjAN3IMuFPWP+ugqyZ8k/xK8X95sodL+Xqa iO8oucXGNB9AZAd55TfRriISkopBV7ER4L9pP+XWOGugFqg5mj40fFbb/Ho4JQ6MdcBmn4 c30F2Po1yeg1XM2nPM1K/hu5PZF2ohc75u5q+rg/JY10dDrlUaKzbFFbc2k/o1b1EVALTO nGnpcLQOmsc53rdossmrm90lo9Zz4cMwQyfT+8q0Sup0rCM/mvLdBENNHmVaDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1738447004; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DhQNDfQmOz7AYcWY5I0MUwErFoevQ4eSVsQemx5l8sU=; b=wqmu2rsZ89jvUdIuF0VfZN+0frBRd1IpK86m7rVS0WM5zCaL2PXfuXhVkT/Ciio2ZtEfnM CrCPL1ZkBApGjlJDwMg+yl6TP7CrvwtoyDcPLiifmusuLin/9V4XGG1ujILsUD513NG5FV mtxuC4tibA2QSAhEffIL/YU7ZlqzNjjWuR5MFR1M636CyW5X074QGzgk/QXLdp+4iVOTsD Fwcil6eli90Dd6NxjhHsPujM+uMXbupfP6NBSRU9u9//5vyHb2rWlrXqBjsjMZfjsVjdET kFHleg7YOBy2y58VYcqJpE4bMRh+GOf4eFybpU3nQKfPUvyn0yPoi8kcu1A3oQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1738447004; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pFXtIN7JRJ97eCHIC52Qxu7mV7VuyRDuAISIKuQEAoIsVKhHnB/UzEoBwqQTLYzVk0LaBc tw37voq+qlgjANc20S0vepcSm43Wk3e+jYhtmctSQfZMjoT2BHPPdy5GZnyclTTATpocUN 97f14R0ETey/QzW7/s8QbjNm++wG3E1KRk2Qq+FAyQ3xAz8lAMkgHyAaepsUOHQ0fJ3y/8 4AswC+vOblIj73j31woTvPw41ZmO5is4YnAumOFPCkd2erhCVSk835YOlvVdwDUXvHizB5 jpq0D6fE9l7LEypvjITGU/URg0H65V+AMi7SlcjtpLXc8t6f2rFjS2GJecj4Sg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Ylmn75ZqMz4J7; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 21:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C5CA21BC07D; Sat, 01 Feb 2025 22:56:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 22:56:36 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Guido Falsi Cc: Nuno Teixeira , "Hurling, Rainer" , Dimitry Andric , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Message-ID: References: <68bbf05d-1d4a-4819-bb83-be6c4f002a63@gwdg.de> <7fb64cac-9b09-4235-9235-2bfb6c228442@gwdg.de> <4de598b1-a576-4ac6-949c-63d1065d818d@madpilot.net> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: > > > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > > Hello Rainer, > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has > > > > > worked intensively on the pkg updates. > > > > > > > > Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@. > > > > > > Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with > > > unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look. > > > > > > I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround that > > > works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine. > > > > > > I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be useful > > > to other people as a work around. > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 > > > > > > -- > > > Guido Falsi > > > > at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it next week > > > > Bapt > > > > After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a need for > After a deeper analysis: > 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the > PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version. > > I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for people not > using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regarding the :32 > handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere). > > I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am. > > For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is tracking 32 > bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking base > libraries always. > > After a deeper analysis: > My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would work ok as > if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase. > > What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to consider them > as provided. > > Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgbase, will > scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am interesting > in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d unhappy) > > Best regards, > Bapt > And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit livraries, so everything should be fine.