Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> > > Hello Rainer,
> > > 
> > >  > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has
> > >  > worked intensively on the pkg updates.
> > > 
> > > Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@.
> > 
> > Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with
> > unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look.
> > 
> > I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround that
> > works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be useful
> > to other people as a work around.
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204
> > 
> > -- 
> > Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
> 
> at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it next week
> 
> Bapt
> 

After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a need for
After a deeper analysis:
32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the
PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version.

I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for people not
using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regarding the :32
handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere).

I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am.

For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is tracking 32
bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking base
libraries always.

After a deeper analysis:
My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would work ok as
if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase.

What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to consider them
as provided.

Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgbase, will
scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am interesting
in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d unhappy)

Best regards,
Bapt