www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml illegible

[Alexey Zelkin]

hi,

I agree that orange is more preferable than yellow.  Please also
check all related lists and fix colors there too.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:19:45PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:11:00PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
> >   Could I suggest the following patch?  Yellow text on a white background 
> > is rather hard to read.
> > 
> > --- www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml
> > +++ www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> >  <!ENTITY status.na "<font color=green>N/A</font>">
> >  <!ENTITY status.done "<font color=green>Done</font>">
> >  <!ENTITY status.wip "<font color=blue>In&nbsp;progress</font>">
> > -<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=yellow>Needs&nbsp;testing</font>">
> > +<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=green>Needs&nbsp;testing</font>">
> >  <!ENTITY status.new "<font color=red>Not&nbsp;done</font>">
> >  <!ENTITY status.unknown "<font color=red>Unknown</font>">
> >  ]>
> 
> In true bikeshed fashion, I have to disagree on your choice of colour.
> Using green here implies that that task is done - I'd rather use
> orange/amber but I don't know if that works in most/any browsers or not.
> 
> Ceri
> 
> --