www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml illegible

[Simon L. Nielsen]

On 2003.11.25 13:25:32 +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
> At 13:19 25/11/2003 +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:11:00PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
> >> -<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=yellow>Needs&nbsp;testing</font>">
> >> +<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=green>Needs&nbsp;testing</font>">
> >
> >In true bikeshed fashion, I have to disagree on your choice of colour.
> >Using green here implies that that task is done - I'd rather use
> >orange/amber but I don't know if that works in most/any browsers or not.
> 
>   To be honest, I don't care what the colour is, as long as it's legible; 
> I picked green because it was the first colour which came to mind, but I 
> agree that it does give the wrong implication.
>   Orange works for me.

I just tested with the browsers I have here (mozilla/opera/IE) and
orange is much more readable than the current yellow (which actually
isn't readable at all)... Just my 0.02dkr.

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Documentation Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-www/attachments/20031125/1dcb3835/attachment.bin