which flash? (plugins, wrappers)

[Yu-Shun Wang]

Hi,

Thanks for the quick answer. Some more questions below.

Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:

<snip>

>>So what's the recommended combination here? Should I uninstall
>>what I have before going to the new flash (6.0) stuff?

> 	Maybe, flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 and linux-flashplugin-5.0r51.
> 	Or new linuxpluginwrapper-20031120(not committed) and
> 	linux-flashplugin6-6.0r79.

Two short questions:

- Should I uninstall one before install another?
- Is it the intention to have a generic linux plugin wrapper (hence
   the name)? Or I'd suggest following the naming convention of
   flashpluginwrapperX (X=6 in this case) rather than having yet
   another name which is IMHO not very intuitive for someone
   not following the list. :-)

>>My current browser is mozilla 1.5, but will probably upgrade to
>>1.6a soon.

> 	Please wait until commit linuxpluginwrapper, if you use Flash6.

Sure. And thanks for the good works!

yushun.
-- 
Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa at isi.edu>
USC Information Sciences Institute
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3457 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20031120/9761dc94/smime.bin