Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food
- Reply: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk : "Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food"
- Reply: Mark Tinka : "Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food"
- Reply: Steve O'Hara-Smith : "Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food"
- In reply to: Tomasz CEDRO : "Re: Using a FreeBSD desktop was somehting about dog food"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 14:28:10 UTC
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 14:18:06 +0200, Tomasz CEDRO stated: >On Sun, Mar 27, 2022, 11:26 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> This means that trouble is not coming from "Open Source" but from >> "Management of Use of Open Source " . >> >> >> Over the years , without relentlessly I am mentioning this difficulty >> point . >> It seems that there is no hope to reach a solution to this problem >> . I do not know why . >> > >The root cause of this are ideologies. "change is good". "the only >constant is change". "software development is about enforcing vision". >This is mostly thanks to Microsoft. Fancy Linux "bleeding edge" >followed. Then big tech like Google with Android and Smartphones did >the same what Microsoft did with Windows and PC. Then Samsung >followed. Then Apple followed. Now it's considered standard. Building >something without solid fundaments plus constant change of the >fundaments. > >Look at JavaScript and try to do anything with that mess, something >fundamentally flawed but extremely available and popular, not to >mention malware showing up more and more recently in various >dependencies that are totally out of control. > >This mess impacts BSD world but it is not welcome here and I hope it >never will. This is why I love BSD. More and more people can see that >too :-) > >-- >CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info "Publish or perish " is an aphorism describing the pressure to publish academic work to succeed in an academic career. A parallel can be drawn between that analogy and the need for software and operating system developers to innovate or wither on the vine. At the very least, they need to stay competitive, which means they must keep current. FreeBSD never innovates and rarely stays even remotely current. They are consistently behind other operating systems regarding innovation and staying current with modern devices, i.e., the 555-BEOY: Thunderbolt 3 PCIe Network and IO Card. {See: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237666} FreeBSD may be fine for commercial use in servers, but it is falling seriously behind in the consumer market. The public, in general, is not interested in using an OS that fails to run their favorite or industry-standard software. Nor are they relishing the opportunity to be held hostage to a system that will not accommodate modern hardware devices. Even an ordinary, everyday item such as a printer driver can be an exercise in futility with FreeBSD. Getting a current driver with full printer support is difficult at best in way too many instances. I contacted Brother USA a few years ago inquiring about a driver for a high-end laser printer I had purchased. They had drivers for several *nix products, but none for FreeBSD. The engineer I spoke to ran Linux on his home PC and fully felt my pain. He explained that FreeBSD was just not mature enough to invest the money and time required to produce a full line of drivers. As I see it, FreeBSD will be relegated to the back of the pack for home use. I do not know a single business, at least a fortune 500, or any municipality that uses FreeBSD for their office PCs. If FreeBSD wants to stay relevant in the home market, they need to up their game and stop putting out a new version simply to put out a new version and rather invest the time and effort required to correct the existing bugs in FreeBSD and create drivers for newer devices. -- Jerry And in the immortal words of Elvira Hancock's advice to Tony Montana, "Don't get high on your own supply."