Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles
- In reply to: Tatsuki Makino : "Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 22:52:56 UTC
Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Graham Perrin wrote on 2023/08/05 03:33: >> On 04/08/2023 15:43, void wrote: > > An example of just a maintainer case hangs here. > All ports which I am a maintainer use the same email address as this email. > The email address I use for my FreeBSD Bugzilla account is the same as this email. > > And the following two bug reports exist > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262878 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268317 > > I am in receipt of emails regarding these two bug reports with the following subject line. > maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 262878] ports-mgmt/pkg_tree better WWW address for the package description > maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 268317] multimedia/openshot: update to 3.0.0 > > Thus, the condition for the maintainer to receive an email at the same time the report is posted seems to exist. > But I do not know how to do it 🤣 > In particular, 262878 was Graham-san, how did you do it? :) > > Use Enter Bug for Ports & Packages? > The line of Summary: begins with port origin? This. Bugzilla Automation 2022-03-28 08:59:14 CEST Flags: maintainer-feedback?(tatsuki_makino@...) When filing a bug, there is a help displayed: Prefix the issue Summary field with category/port: so that MAINTAINER is Assigned or CC'd automatically. > Set the maintainer-feedback flag in the advanced field to "?"?