Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles

Reply: Yuri : "Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles"
In reply to: Graham Perrin : "Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 22:23:28 UTC

Hello.

Graham Perrin wrote on 2023/08/05 03:33:
> On 04/08/2023 15:43, void wrote:

An example of just a maintainer case hangs here.
All ports which I am a maintainer use the same email address as this email.
The email address I use for my FreeBSD Bugzilla account is the same as this email.

And the following two bug reports exist
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262878
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268317

I am in receipt of emails regarding these two bug reports with the following subject line.
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 262878] ports-mgmt/pkg_tree better WWW address for the package description
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 268317] multimedia/openshot: update to 3.0.0

Thus, the condition for the maintainer to receive an email at the same time the report is posted seems to exist.
But I do not know how to do it 🤣
In particular, 262878 was Graham-san, how did you do it? :)

Use Enter Bug for Ports & Packages?
The line of Summary: begins with port origin?
Set the maintainer-feedback flag in the advanced field to "?"?

Regards.