From nobody Fri Aug 04 22:52:56 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RHgwV6jR9z4mBnh for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@aetern.org) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RHgwV2BWlz3Ggk for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 22:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@aetern.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=aetern.org header.s=fm3 header.b=tEm4ciVU; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="k qECUG+"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yuri@aetern.org designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuri@aetern.org; dmarc=none Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389E95C00E4 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:52:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Aug 2023 18:52:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aetern.org; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1691189578; x=1691275978; bh=PtJHszBhR31CliK2Ypakjes4PsE/+mKTF9/ 4B0BOjfo=; b=tEm4ciVUfBy0uzgqspvcyy0Ci75DFacQbMQlwvDYNiZF2NYDcnj nlJVXBJtlNbPbQI24jbfWRMCDf1wd1NFa3VjfSx0eZGtFOxm8PBbUT2mv+VVdKPK PZRSXlrSBz1TH0wjT0Gwwpj5x3jJtVK0TVIqcc+s8hRfTSCfx2e71Rm0RrOrl+/w 3txDgm0H9Hp0W5FaWFouooqG5uHoA13Goj/HeJ/9yibbwxygiQ//0GkPtJXkf+Vr toYwJpTkWf4ajWuIyzG2NBT7I05AgtrYBzrZxNXuT60e1TCWc5KpJeV83BlCf+Qe PcGQgtFMR0Q6K0n+/fLS3MM33jY8fcxUCqA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1691189578; x= 1691275978; bh=PtJHszBhR31CliK2Ypakjes4PsE/+mKTF9/4B0BOjfo=; b=k qECUG+GFzxaxjSD+WlfQEXJpy7fd+jhzia15xocwXm72TbL2ntwPHu1MUvQ2Jb4B uS3NCwEn1Cq5ebyHs/VxR1LcGu/MBgKWrhnEKypuMwTH3eWxWuQ/G1gUTvkpm+kz 0DK5ysLJ4VOaQ8wyRu4+f5/i9FbHfrVMEYSRIA/xXCWGBg7yYPiah+hNC74uYIis nchKsvaEJe27jLJgVBvAQMi9AGJwAEsfpigKXgcLRiETTGCBvkA4guuiJ8g6aQWj dr5bbe0i/1cq0Dy0ipT9Rl5qBCofKSnEFemjegtkxXwl69Fa8DkD9iHzkM1kukwv 1EdscPI8w/f27W1tiHCrA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrkeehgdduvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekre dttddvjeenucfhrhhomhepjghurhhiuceohihurhhisegrvghtvghrnhdrohhrgheqnecu ggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteekvefgfeetjeehieefudeivdekudektedufffgjeelhfdtje ekleehvdekuddunecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhephihurhhisegrvghtvghrnh drohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0d79475b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:52:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 00:52:56 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <6D24E23B-1F79-47E9-B533-361188502BEA@lassitu.de> <76ad55a3-46c2-146e-6005-b300dc911e1c@freebsd.org> <05a2883a-c7ee-add7-9fd3-2b3d7c60876a@freebsd.org> From: Yuri In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RHgwV2BWlz3Ggk X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=multimap; Matched map: local_wl_from X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.89 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_EXCELLENT(-0.40)[66.111.4.29:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[aetern.org:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29:c]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[aetern.org:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[aetern.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[yuri]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; local_wl_from(0.00)[yuri@aetern.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19151, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US] Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Graham Perrin wrote on 2023/08/05 03:33: >> On 04/08/2023 15:43, void wrote: > > An example of just a maintainer case hangs here. > All ports which I am a maintainer use the same email address as this email. > The email address I use for my FreeBSD Bugzilla account is the same as this email. > > And the following two bug reports exist > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262878 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268317 > > I am in receipt of emails regarding these two bug reports with the following subject line. > maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 262878] ports-mgmt/pkg_tree better WWW address for the package description > maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 268317] multimedia/openshot: update to 3.0.0 > > Thus, the condition for the maintainer to receive an email at the same time the report is posted seems to exist. > But I do not know how to do it 🤣 > In particular, 262878 was Graham-san, how did you do it? :) > > Use Enter Bug for Ports & Packages? > The line of Summary: begins with port origin? This. Bugzilla Automation 2022-03-28 08:59:14 CEST Flags: maintainer-feedback?(tatsuki_makino@...) When filing a bug, there is a help displayed: Prefix the issue Summary field with category/port: so that MAINTAINER is Assigned or CC'd automatically. > Set the maintainer-feedback flag in the advanced field to "?"?