Re: git: 28472e9722d8 - main - Revert "x11-fonts/noto*: Restructure and update"
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:12:07 UTC
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:38 PM Tobias C. Berner <tcberner@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Samstag, 23. März 2024, 15:14:01 CET schrieb Gleb Popov: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 5:04 PM Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > The branch main has been updated by sunpoet: > > > > > > URL: > > > > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=28472e9722d808739a4d690f6d803a2 > > > b1b8f5f98 > > > > > > commit 28472e9722d808739a4d690f6d803a2b1b8f5f98 > > > Author: Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org> > > > AuthorDate: 2024-03-23 14:01:07 +0000 > > > Commit: Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org> > > > CommitDate: 2024-03-23 14:01:07 +0000 > > > > > > Revert "x11-fonts/noto*: Restructure and update" > > > > > > This reverts commit 3b128ff9f74b28ada2f475f0b816480b1550e5b8. > > > > It is good manners to explain the reason for reverting when doing it. > > Even better to first talk to the original committer and ask him to the > > revert. > > Moin moin > > I completely agree. Given that there has been a phabricator review open > for > two months, with you, sunpoet@ as reviewer, this is looking like poor > judgement on your side. > > As arrowd@ points out, you should have commented on the reverted commit > first, > and elaborate your reasoning for a revert. > > Simply reverting the work of others may lead to fewer contributions. > Please > take this into consideration in the future. > > > mfg Tobias Hello, I'm sorry that I did not put enough information in this reverting commit because I need it to be done ASAP so that less users are affected. There are several reasons I reverted it by myself instead of requesting tijl@ to do so. First, I do not use phab review therefore I did not really review the patch which means it is committed without maintainer approval. Second, I already have my own work for noto updates which is totally in different direction with tijl@'s work. I cannot simply rebase my work onto it. Third, The problem mentioned in the PR is also handled in my own work. Regards, sunpoet