Re: git: b430a140c818 - main - net-im/purple-gowhatsapp: add WhatsApp plugin for libpurple
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:53:59 UTC
On 2024-01-21T20:16:19.000+01:00, Mikhail T. <mi+t@virtual-estates.net> wrote: > 21.01.24 13:47, Daniel Engberg: > >> While we all do mistakes I'm asking because it's broken and it's >> likely not going to be fixed any time soon. > > I wonder, how you estimate this likelihood... > >> In reality it adds noise (which we already have enough of) on >> lists, Poudriere builds (because by default we build all ports) >> takes more time producing nothing, more time for people to review >> error logs and so on. > > All of this could be silenced with BROKEN, no? > >> It boils down to my time > your time which usually don't translate >> well in team efforts. > > No, I don't see it boiling down to that. To me it seems like a > simple overreaction. So, a newly-added port is broken -- what's the > big deal? You'd be right expecting the committer to examine the > error-log himself... It is just computers working -- so the humans, > present company included, can do fun things. > >> Instead of doing the same thing again use Poudriere as you're by >> know well aware that it "should" be used and you have been >> "warned". > > On the contrary -- as long as the "should" remains quoted, I intend > to do the same thing:_commit, what I sincerely believe is working > code_. Mat is already convinced, I MUST follow, what you acknowledge > is just a recommendation -- on the strength of his creating a rule > out of void. Rights not exercised are rights lost, and all that :-) > >> I would also say that you'd be better off in general asking for >> suggestions by creating a PR and or use Phab(ricator) due to >> quality reasons (to mention it again, team effort). > > Believe it or not, I did ask for suggestions before committing -- > sending the shar of the would be port to the committers of <go.mk> > [http://go.mk>]; (because go@FreeBSD.mk is blocked to > non-subscribers). Having received no immediate replies, I figured, > I'll see, what Poudriere would say -- still don't understand the > scale of the blowback... > >> -mi Hi, Seems like you didn't test 26fa495285d9d7bcd85794665c45d31e1ed1ccb2 ? https://pdr2.bofh.network/data/140-diizzy/2024-01-21_17h43m38s/logs/errors/purple-gowhatsapp-1.13.0.log Best regards, Daniel