Two odd problems with STABLE-10 r262921

[Mike Tancsa]

On 3/11/2014 3:30 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Hmmm.. ok, that worked, which implies there's a problem in the ipfw code
> -- does the pf patch address ipfw as well?

I think the patch is pf specific.  I dont use ipfw in a stateful way. 
Perhaps its just an issue of increase its equiv of the state table ? Not 
sure.  Maybe post a sanitized version of your ruleset here to start

	---Mike



-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike at sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/