[full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after certain time...

[Mike Tancsa]

If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have x.y.z.33 
on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20 subnet. I wonder 
if its an incorrect mask calculation ?

         ---Mike

At 12:05 PM 24/09/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
>There are:
>x.y.z/24 with one IP address, x.y.z.1 is the default route.
>a.b.c.0/27 and a.b.c.32/28 with aliased addresses.
>
>fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet x.y.z.33 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast x.y.z.255
>         inet a.b.c.34 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast a.b.c.47
>         inet a.b.c.27 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast a.b.c.31
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>         status: active
>lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
>         inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
>         inet a.b.c.35 netmask 0xffffffff
>         inet a.b.c.36 netmask 0xffffffff
>         inet a.b.c.37 netmask 0xffffffff
>         inet a.b.c.28 netmask 0xffffffff
>         inet a.b.c.29 netmask 0xffffffff
>
>
>Internet:
>Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
>a.b.c.28      a.b.c.28      UH          0        0    lo0
>a.b.c.29      a.b.c.29      UH          0        0    lo0
>a.b.c.35      a.b.c.35      UH          0        0    lo0
>a.b.c.36      a.b.c.36      UH          0        0    lo0
>a.b.c.37      a.b.c.37      UH          0        0    lo0
>127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          0        0    lo0
>x.y.z         link#1             UC          1        0   fxp0
>x.y.z.54      00:01:02:03:04:05  UHLW        1      506   fxp0   1123
>
>
>Of course I can also see in logs messages like:
>/kernel: arplookup a.b.c.1 failed: host is not on local network
>
>
>--
>Pawe³ Ma³achowski