Time to mark lang/ruby18 DEPRECATED

[clutton]

Yeap, great idea.

OS X 10.9 ships with ruby 2.0 as the system version already!
http://i.imgur.com/RHBRnmD.png

On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 20:19 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> Great!  It's fantastic to see ruby 1.8 finally go.
> 
> Now, why don't we make Ruby 2.0 the default version instead of 1.9?
> 
> Ruby 2.0 is highly (upper) compatible with 1.9 and there should be no
> reason to adopt Ruby 1.9.3 by now.  Ruby 1.9 is unlikely to have any
> more build/platform related change that would expand supported
> platforms, architectures or compilers, so I think we should adopt Ruby
> 2.0 now that FreeBSD 10 is soon to be shipped with a new compiler and
> toolchain that are rapidly evolving.
> 
> What do you guys think?  Is there any essential package that does not
> run on Ruby 2.0, in which case I could help?
> 
> --
> Akinori MUSHA / https://akinori.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/attachments/20131023/09955d84/attachment.sig>