Time to mark lang/ruby18 DEPRECATED

[Akinori MUSHA]

Great!  It's fantastic to see ruby 1.8 finally go.

Now, why don't we make Ruby 2.0 the default version instead of 1.9?

Ruby 2.0 is highly (upper) compatible with 1.9 and there should be no
reason to adopt Ruby 1.9.3 by now.  Ruby 1.9 is unlikely to have any
more build/platform related change that would expand supported
platforms, architectures or compilers, so I think we should adopt Ruby
2.0 now that FreeBSD 10 is soon to be shipped with a new compiler and
toolchain that are rapidly evolving.

What do you guys think?  Is there any essential package that does not
run on Ruby 2.0, in which case I could help?

--
Akinori MUSHA / https://akinori.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/attachments/20131023/32343734/attachment.sig>