freebsd-update - Cannot identify running kernel
doug at safeport.com
doug at safeport.com
Sun Aug 2 06:32:48 UTC 2020
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, doug wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, David Christensen wrote:
>
>> On 2020-08-01 17:31, doug wrote:
>>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, Doug Denault wrote:
>>>
>>>> I did an update from 11.3 --> 12.1 that did not seem to work.
>>
>>>> I have a 12.0
>>>> system that did not have the error so I thought I would update to 12.0
>>>> to try to get a handle on my problem.
>>
>> I assume you mean "update to 12.1"?
>>
>>
>>>> This update did not exactly work. It will boot and I suspect I can do
>>>> anything not requiring access to /boot.
>>
>> On my system, /boot is a symlink; not a ZFS filesystem:
>>
>> 2020-08-01 18:10:51 toor at f3 ~
>> # freebsd-version ; uname -a
>> 12.1-RELEASE-p7
>> FreeBSD f3.tracy.holgerdanske.com 12.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD
>> 12.1-RELEASE-p7 GENERIC amd64
>>
>> 2020-08-01 18:22:18 toor at f3 ~
>> # ll /boot
>> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 2019/10/31 21:37:10 /boot@ -> bootpool/boot
>>
>> 2020-08-01 18:22:44 toor at f3 ~
>> # zfs list -r | egrep 'NAME|boot|/$'
>> NAME USED AVAIL
>> REFER MOUNTPOINT
>> bootpool 372M 1.42G
>> 190M /bootpool
>> soho2_zroot/ROOT/default 4.23G 4.28G 2.22G
> /
>>
>>
>>> The zfs boot process is not
>>>> bothered by this problem.
>>>>
>>>> zpool list
>>>> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP
>>>> HEALTH ALTROOT
>>>> bootpool 1.98G 274M 1.72G - - 15% 13% 1.00x
>>>> ONLINE -
>>>> zroot 920G 7.76G 912G - - 0% 0% 1.00x
>>>> ONLINE -
>>
>> So, a 1 TB HDD? I would use that for data.
>>
>>
>> I put my systems on small SSD's:
>>
>> 2020-08-01 18:14:08 toor at f3 ~
>> # camcontrol devlist | grep ada0
>> <INTEL SSDSC2CW060A3 400i> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (ada0,pass0)
>>
>>
>>>> So ... is my analysis correct? If so how do it put bootpool/boot/
>>>> where "it belongs"?
>>
>> Look for the symlink, as above.
>>
>>
>>> So after some reading, I might be making more of this than it is. Seems
>>> to me because so little data is involved make /boot, copy the data and
>>> perhaps rename bootpool to something just to be safe.
>>
>> I have assumed 'bootpool' is hard coded into the bootloader(s), and
>> renaming it will break boot. So, I have not tried renaming bootpool.
>>
>>
>> I would advise taking an image of your system drive before proceeding,
>> but an image of a 1 TB system drive could require a lot of storage (this
>> is why I use small SSD's for system drives).
>>
>>
>>> If so the next
>>> question is did freebsd-update leave anything else behind?
>>
>> I keep my system configuration files in a version control system (CVS).
>>
>>
>> I never do in-place OS major version upgrades. Instead, I make sure the
>> system configuration files are checked in, stop services, backup the
>> data, pull the system drive, insert a blank system drive, do a fresh
>> install, update the OS, install packages, update the packages, check out
>> the old configuration files to a side directory, configure the system as
>> required, restore the data, and start services.
>>
>> David
>
> Thank you. All the systems I have that use zfs I either did the default zfs
> install or they are the way they came from the manufacturer. This system
> has no data on it so I can experiement away. I had assumed the bootpool
> pool came from freebsd-update. I do not remember that /boot was a symlink
> bur was wasn't really paying any attention to that. I appreciate all the
> info.
The problem of freebsd-update not working was caused by the absense of
/boot. The fix is, as suggested above, make /boot a symlink to
/bootpool/boot. I absoluted verified this as my first attempt was to copy
/bootpool/boot --> /boot. I then updated 12.0 --> 12.1. However this boots
12.0. Apparently from posts not all 12.x systems have /bootpool/boot.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list