"swap" partition leads to instability?
jb
jb.1234abcd at gmail.com
Sun May 26 12:37:15 UTC 2013
M. V. <bored_to_death85 <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
> hi everyone,
>
> I have a 24/7 network server/gateway with FreeBSD-8.2 on a SSD drive. it's
partitioned as normal (/ , /tmp,
> /var , /usr and swap) for a long time now. But recently I heard from a
FreeBSD expert that I shouldn't have
> swap partition for my server, and having swap partition could make my
server unstable. this was so strange
> for me, and I searched a lot but couldn't find a reason for this claim.
>
> so my question is simple:
> - could having a "swap" partition, be a bad thing for my FreeBSD server?
and if so, why and in what conditions?
>
> Cheers!
Hi,
I think your FB expert was up to something. I bet he spoke out of experience.
Swapping by itself can decrease system reliability due to possible data
corruption on swap disk or during two-way transfers, with subsequent incorrect
RAM and machine crash.
But, swapping is also a symptom, not a problem.
It is never a good idea to let it get to that point.
Badly written, architected, or tuned server app or system are the reason.
Think of RDBMS/SQL server processing real-time on-line transactions and how
much it goes into setting it up properly for a heavy use.
On a smaller scale, consider this example:
http://blog.jcole.us/2010/09/28/mysql-swap-insanity-and-the-numa-architecture/
jb
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list