problems after rebuild of 5.5 stable
Matthew Pope
mpope at teksavvy.com
Mon Oct 23 01:13:19 UTC 2006
Matthew Pope wrote:
> Matthew Pope wrote:
>
>> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> Matthew Pope <mpope at teksavvy.com> writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> for temp file for many of the prompts. Now my 5.5 kernel boots, but
>>>> there are a number of messages of the form:
>>>> source_rc_confs: not found
>>>> $ipnat_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5)
>>>> $ipfs_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5)
>>>> etc....
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> I later read in the mailing list that someone had a simliar problem
>>>> and solved it by re-running the mergemaster step. I tried that too,
>>>> and this time I selected <default> answer to all the prompts about
>>>> conflicts.
>>>
>>>
>>> The default operation in mergemaster is to do nothing, so if you're
>>> going to choose the default the whole way, you might as well skip
>>> running mergemaster at all.
>>
>>
>> Yes, well put. That clarified I was in fact consuming resources in a
>> less than optimal way :-)
>>
>>> Go back through mergemaster, and actually
>>> pay attention to the changes. On files you haven't modified, you will
>>> be able to (i)nstall the new versions of those files, but otherwise
>>> you will need to (m)erge them.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I tried that but my system is too far gone. Close to 100
>> environment vars are missing and if I jam them all into rc.conf it
>> will be a mess, especially since I would be guessing at the
>> appropriate values for the vars.
>> My next step is to start from scratch (as Albi suggested.)
>> Unfortuntely, even with ipfw set to open, I am still getting no route
>> to host when I try and ping my gateway.
>>
>> It was always pingable in the past, and I've checked the cable into
>> my new-ish switch and all seems fine, with green lights. The result
>> of a route -n is in another virtual terminal and I can't copy and
>> paste, but it lists the headers and then nothing for the details,
>> i.e. no routes are in the routing table at all.
>
>
> OK pen and paper come to the rescue, here is the result of netstat -n
> on my misconfigured, 5.5 stable, upgraded system that can not seem to
> ping the gateway let alone do a cvsup:
>
> Active UNIX domain sockets
> Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs NextRef Addr
> c20761a4 Stream 0 0 c207a000 0
> 0 0 /var/run/devd.pipe
>
> I tried trying ifup sis0 but I discovered ifup is no longer around.
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
OK found the problem using ifconfig. As a result of the botched
rebuild, (my bad), my netword card was given an IP_V6 address but no
IP_V4 address.
I used
# ifconfig sis0 add 10.1.1.99
This put me back in touch with the world on this server. Now I can cvsup
to a production 'Release' version of FreeBSD, and rebuild all.
Will tag=RELENG_6_1 for cvsup be the latest 'Release' then of FreeBSD,
not stable, nor current, but Release?
Thanks in advance,
Matthew
>> Further suggestions welcome, and thanks for your help so far.
>> Sincerely,
>> Matthew
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list