Newer names
Bcf0330 at aol.com
Bcf0330 at aol.com
Sat Aug 30 01:52:12 PDT 2003
Please read entire article before sending any comment to me.
Why would any one wish to change the term "DAEMON", "D.A.E.Mon.", and "Disk
and execution monitor", to a more fitting title.
In practice this term has grown outdated. For today it stands that many
people in the world abroad don't profusely rely on the veritable "disk based"
storage as a complete solution. There are other storage mediums which are without a
disk. For example: Flash cards, USB pen drives and the sort have no circular
rotary disks.
It would be more fitting to address the storage units as media or storage
media. Thus the title DAEMON could be reverted to SMAEMON or Storage Media And
Executon MONitor.
Even further involved is the choice of the term "execution". The term
execution, is not as precise as Tasks or Processes for a naming convention. For
example, in Windows 2000, there is a task manager. In that task manager there are
processes and applications that can be canceled.
Sure, MIT's CTSS people came up with the term, DAEMON, as noted in
www.dictionary.com, but would you want to keep it?
In this world, would you like to have a term in the future that connotes a
certain religious involvement? It could provoke any further controversy in the
public if the Unix and Linux community goes even further into the Desktop
market. Particularly groups of people could simply dismiss the operating system,
since it has many references to a program that connotes an adverse spirits. Thus
dissuading them from purchasing, developing, or involving there self in such
a product. The mere suggestion of an affiliation or like thereof of an
offending spirit, based on their preference of relation/religion with this life,
would turn them away from such product.
In other words, why would a spiritually right person want to associate with a
daemon [demon]?
Furthermore, society in general would benefit from a newer name than DAEMON.
MS Windows, Novell NetWare, OS/2 Warp, Ecomstation, Sun's Solaris and several
other operating system don't need this incorrect term floating around in their
operating systems.
As a practical usage this term adjustment sounds very much needed and desired
when proposed to the IT community and the rest of the world.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list