print/muttprint

[Antoine Brodin]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > mat@ mailed that
>> >
>> > USE_TEX=latex dvipsk
>> >
>> > should be used instead of the two additional run_deps.
>>
>> A side note:
>>
>> bapt switched from 'latex' to texlive:
> [...]
>
>> > Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ?
>
> Btw, what is your use-case ?
>
> How do you invoke muttprint and what does it call and what does it do
> in the end ? Does it really generate a .ps to send to the printer ?
>
>> > and yes, when you compile the port directly with
>>
>> # make install
>>
>> 'USE_TEX= texlive' pulls in
>> Tex, but it does not if you compile the ports with poudriere.
>
> I'm surprised that USE_TEX=texlive in poudriere does not pull it in.
> Can you provide a build log to show this ?

Hi,

Not sure what you are talking about,  but USE_TEX=texlive doesn't exit.

Cheers,

Antoine


>
>> I brought
>> this question up in freebsd-pkg@ but did not got any comments on this.
>>
>> I can revoke the change in my VM / poudriere and send in a complete log
>> of the compilation of print/muttprint if someone is willing to dig into.
>
> Yes, please.
>
>> For the moment, I have not found any other solution as the two
>> additional lines.
>
> Well, if it solves your problem, then it's definitly a good sign 8-)
>
> --
> pi at opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"