print/muttprint
Kurt Jaeger
lists at opsec.eu
Sat Oct 11 16:28:57 UTC 2014
Hi!
> > mat@ mailed that
> >
> > USE_TEX=latex dvipsk
> >
> > should be used instead of the two additional run_deps.
>
> A side note:
>
> bapt switched from 'latex' to texlive:
[...]
> > Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ?
Btw, what is your use-case ?
How do you invoke muttprint and what does it call and what does it do
in the end ? Does it really generate a .ps to send to the printer ?
> > and yes, when you compile the port directly with
>
> # make install
>
> 'USE_TEX= texlive' pulls in
> Tex, but it does not if you compile the ports with poudriere.
I'm surprised that USE_TEX=texlive in poudriere does not pull it in.
Can you provide a build log to show this ?
> I brought
> this question up in freebsd-pkg@ but did not got any comments on this.
>
> I can revoke the change in my VM / poudriere and send in a complete log
> of the compilation of print/muttprint if someone is willing to dig into.
Yes, please.
> For the moment, I have not found any other solution as the two
> additional lines.
Well, if it solves your problem, then it's definitly a good sign 8-)
--
pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list