ipfw pf

Max Laier max at love2party.net
Mon Apr 9 01:28:27 UTC 2007


On Sunday 08 April 2007 23:15, KES wrote:
> What coming first: ipfw or pf?
> -->rl0-->ipfw-->pf-->kernel-->pf--->ipfw
> or
> -->rl0-->pf-->ipfw-->kernel-->ipfw--->pf
> ?

Unfortunately you can't tell right now.  It depends on when/how you enable 
the components.  I did have some patches to allow for pfil reordering, 
but they were interchanged with locking changes that were not such a good 
idea.  I intend to provide a mechanism to set the order via sysctl once 
we have a final plan for pfil locking.  Sorry.

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier at EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/attachments/20070409/922bcb8f/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-pf mailing list