ipfw pf
Max Laier
max at love2party.net
Mon Apr 9 01:28:27 UTC 2007
On Sunday 08 April 2007 23:15, KES wrote:
> What coming first: ipfw or pf?
> -->rl0-->ipfw-->pf-->kernel-->pf--->ipfw
> or
> -->rl0-->pf-->ipfw-->kernel-->ipfw--->pf
> ?
Unfortunately you can't tell right now. It depends on when/how you enable
the components. I did have some patches to allow for pfil reordering,
but they were interchanged with locking changes that were not such a good
idea. I intend to provide a mechanism to set the order via sysctl once
we have a final plan for pfil locking. Sorry.
--
/"\ Best regards, | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier at EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/attachments/20070409/922bcb8f/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-pf
mailing list