[Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226

--- Comment #13 from eugen at grosbein.net ---
(In reply to weberge42 from comment #12)

> each switch has different default and miniumum values

Yes, and one should not depend on default values but configure switches as
required.

> But what if you can't (or not allowed) to change this settings ?

Too bad for you if you have manageable equipment but can't manage it.

> I just don't see any relationship between manual ifconfig in case of a failover. Can you please elaborate this a bit more ? Maybe i'm missing something.

In case of "non-manual" failure physical link goes down generally and
corresponding switch changes its FIB at once.

If one connects redundant layer-2 links to different switches, one should use
some kind of signalling protocol like RSTP.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.