[Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226

--- Comment #12 from weberge42 at gmail.com ---
Yes, but each switch has different default and miniumum values.
Fortiswitch: 10s, HP Procurve 60s, don't know about cisco.

So that would mean XXs no service in case of a failover which may be acceptable
if its short enough. But what if you can't (or not allowed) to change this
settings ? 

I don't quite understand what you mean with:

>And yes, lagg's failover needs that NIC drivers bring link down in case of >voluntary "ifconfig down"

Who issues the ifconfig down ? I just don't see any relationship between manual
ifconfig in case of a failover.
Can you please elaborate this a bit more ? Maybe i'm missing something.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.