Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)

[Luigi Rizzo]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:19:12PM +0300, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > 
> > BTW for the 'setnexthop', the port number does not really make
> > much sense... though it can be useful as a degenerate 'nexthop' case
> > to forward to a local port.
> 
> Didn't remember to comment on this. I left the port number
> possibility there although it is really questionable if it
> is useful (I won't be needing it now).

ok.
Seen the patch, looks good. It's always nice to see how easy it is to
add new options to ipfw2 :)

	cheers
	luigi