Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?)

[Ari Suutari]

Hi,

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> 
> BTW for the 'setnexthop', the port number does not really make
> much sense... though it can be useful as a degenerate 'nexthop' case
> to forward to a local port.

Didn't remember to comment on this. I left the port number
possibility there although it is really questionable if it
is useful (I won't be needing it now).

	Ari S.