cluster FS?

Jordan Hubbard jkh at mail.turbofuzz.com
Wed Oct 1 09:38:38 UTC 2014


> On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas at bris.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> So are you saying that the SAN model
> is not good for active/active failover
> with multiple nodes?

Correct.  SAN is active/passive.

For more information on high availability solutions, I suggest you check out the big file server vendors - there’s far more pertinent information in their various whitepapers then you’ll ever get on freebsd-hackers. :)

- Jordan



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list