Fwd: my git development snapshot(s)

[Arnaud Lacombe]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
>>> >> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
>>> >> somehow happen :-)  This seems definitely easier than carefully producing the
>>> >> patch files and keeping them up-to-date.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, my newly cloned gitorious repository:
>>> >> https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd
>>> >>
>>> >> And the first branch of interest:
>>> >> https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd/commits/devel-20110915
>>> >
>>> > I'll throw mine in as well:
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/uqs/freebsd-head/branches
>>> >
>>> is that the same as tree as Fabien's, or a new snapshot ?
>>>
>>> If not, couldn't we agree to have all the same tree in order to ease
>>> code sharing between all of them ?
>>>
>>> I see there is already a https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd tree,
>>> which seem different than Fabien's tree on github. It really look like
>>> The FreeBSD Project (https://github.com/freebsd/) is not able to
>>> provide consistency.
>>
>> The freebsd-head tree is the same that everybody in the world can get by
>> simply running git svn clone against the FreeBSD subversion server
>> (you'd need a lot of patience, though).
>>
> FWIW, how comes that there is not yet any `stable/9' branch on the github tree ?
>
Ulrich, ping ?

 - Arnaud