Fwd: my git development snapshot(s)

[Arnaud Lacombe]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
>> >> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
>> >> somehow happen :-)  This seems definitely easier than carefully producing the
>> >> patch files and keeping them up-to-date.
>> >>
>> >> So, my newly cloned gitorious repository:
>> >> https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd
>> >>
>> >> And the first branch of interest:
>> >> https://gitorious.org/~avg/freebsd/avgbsd/commits/devel-20110915
>> >
>> > I'll throw mine in as well:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/uqs/freebsd-head/branches
>> >
>> is that the same as tree as Fabien's, or a new snapshot ?
>>
>> If not, couldn't we agree to have all the same tree in order to ease
>> code sharing between all of them ?
>>
>> I see there is already a https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd tree,
>> which seem different than Fabien's tree on github. It really look like
>> The FreeBSD Project (https://github.com/freebsd/) is not able to
>> provide consistency.
>
> The freebsd-head tree is the same that everybody in the world can get by
> simply running git svn clone against the FreeBSD subversion server
> (you'd need a lot of patience, though).
>
FWIW, how comes that there is not yet any `stable/9' branch on the github tree ?

Thanks,
 - Arnaud

> It's also available from git.freebsd.your.org and on code.google.com
> (except that Google's git backend sucks ass).
>
> Fabien's tree is cut off at an arbitrary date and if you happen to
> choose a different date, well you cannot merge any branches with that
> repository.
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow
>
> Uli
>