_LP64 and _ILP32

[Ben Laurie]

On 05/06/2011 06:03, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'd add them for all !_LP64 architectures: arm, mips o32, mips n32, i386, and powerpc...

Forgive the stupid question, but ... add them to what?

> 
> Warner
> 
> On Jun 4, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
>> It turns out that both clang and gcc define _LP64 when used native on amd64.
>>
>> Neither defines _ILP32 on i386 (native or cross-compiled).
>>
>> dt_popc() in cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_subr.c
>> needs on or the other. clang notices because when _ILP32 is missing
>> there's no return.
>>
>> So ... thoughts?--
>>
>> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/
>>
>> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
>> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff