_LP64 and _ILP32

Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com
Sun Jun 5 05:08:45 UTC 2011


I'd add them for all !_LP64 architectures: arm, mips o32, mips n32, i386, and powerpc...

Warner

On Jun 4, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:

> It turns out that both clang and gcc define _LP64 when used native on amd64.
> 
> Neither defines _ILP32 on i386 (native or cross-compiled).
> 
> dt_popc() in cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_subr.c
> needs on or the other. clang notices because when _ILP32 is missing
> there's no return.
> 
> So ... thoughts?--
> 
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/
> 
> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
> 



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list