Subversion/CVS experiment summary

[Roman Neuhauser]

# scrappy at hub.org / 2004-02-12 16:48:25 -0400:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
> > starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
> 
> I missed the original thread here, so this point may have already been
> made ... but ... we tried to use subversion for a project recently, and
> made a *big* mistake of upgrading to a newer version from what we started
> with ... and could no longer access the repository ... apparently there is
> a 'dump / reload' procedure that we weren't aware of at the time, but this
> is something that should be watched for ...

    dump/reload cycles required by a new version from time to time are
    announced prominently.

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html