Subversion/CVS experiment summary
Marc G. Fournier
scrappy at hub.org
Thu Feb 12 12:52:47 PST 2004
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
> starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
I missed the original thread here, so this point may have already been
made ... but ... we tried to use subversion for a project recently, and
made a *big* mistake of upgrading to a newer version from what we started
with ... and could no longer access the repository ... apparently there is
a 'dump / reload' procedure that we weren't aware of at the time, but this
is something that should be watched for ...
>From the INSTALL file:
Version 0.34.0 (released 3 December 2003, from revision r7859)
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.34.0
#####################################################################
## WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING ##
#####################################################################
## ##
## This release makes an incompatible change to the Subversion ##
## database. Repositories created with versions of Subversion ##
## prior to 0.34 will not work with Subversion 0.34. ##
## To upgrade, first use 'svnadmin dump' with your existing ##
## Subversion binaries. Then upgrade your binaries to 0.34, and ##
## use 'svnadmin load' to create a new repository from your ##
## dumpfile. ##
## Don't forget to copy any custom configuration/hooks from the ##
## old to the new repository. ##
## ##
#####################################################################
note that this was pre-0.34, but since its still "under development",
there is always the chance that this happens again ... a load of the
system took 49hrs, I believe was mentioned ... how long to dump/reload the
system once its already "in subvsersion" format?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy at hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list