svn commit: r366778 - head/sysutils/garcon

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:23:24 +0000 Olivier Duchateau <olivierd at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:52:39 +0200
> Tijl Coosemans <tijl at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:37:57 +0000 Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
>>> Tijl Coosemans <tijl at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>> Author: tijl
>>>> Date: Sun Aug 31 15:21:24 2014
>>>> New Revision: 366778
>>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/366778
>>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r366778/
>>>> 
>>>> Log:
>>>>   - Add USES=libtool and INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip
>>>>   - Use USES=tar:bzip2
>>>>   - Use option helpers
>>>>   - Install documentation in DOCSDIR
>>> 
>>> Please, revert your change with documentation.
>>> 
>>> It's documentation for API (only for developers, not users).
>>> APIDOCS path follows same rule as GNOME components.
>> 
>> Hmm, I'd like to get a portmgr@ or gnome@ decision on this.  Most ports
>> I've encountered install gtk-doc files in DOCSDIR and even bsd.gnome.mk
>> sets --with-html-dir=${PREFIX}/share/doc.  The fact it is API
>> documentation is not important I think because the entire port is for
>> developers only.
> 
> Why wait for decision of gnome@? This library is part of Xfce, not GNOME.

Because either gnome@ is wrong or xfce@ is wrong and you guys need to
come to an agreement on this.

> API documentation can be viewable with devel/devhelp. And files must
> be installed into gtk-doc/html/ directory (see, Devhelp's README,
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/devhelp/tree/README?id=3.12.1#n12

That seems like a strong argument to use the default gtk-doc location
so I've move it back there now, but I'd still like to hear confirmation
from gnome at .