minor rewording for committers guide

[Warren Block]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, John-Mark Gurney wrote:

> I was trying to find the repo for the www, but the note IMO was poorly
> worded, so I have this patch.  Should I go ahead and commit?
>
> P.S. I'm not on the list, so please include me in the reply.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Index: article.sgml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.303
> diff -u -r1.303 article.sgml
> --- article.sgml	11 Sep 2011 18:04:15 -0000	1.303
> +++ article.sgml	15 Oct 2011 17:40:26 -0000
> @@ -304,9 +304,10 @@
>       <application>CVS</application> but in Subversion.  The official
>       and exported trees are not necessarily equal.</para>
>
> -    <note><para>Note that the <literal>www</literal> module containing sources
> -      for the <ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink> is
> -      contained within the <literal>doc</literal> repository.</para></note>
> +    <note><para>Note that the sources for the
> +      <ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink> are

I think that should be

       <ulink url="&url.base;">&os; website</ulink> are

(untested)