minor rewording for committers guide

[Manolis Kiagias]

On 15/10/2011 8:46 μμ, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> I was trying to find the repo for the www, but the note IMO was poorly
> worded, so I have this patch.  Should I go ahead and commit?
>
> P.S. I'm not on the list, so please include me in the reply.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Index: article.sgml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.303
> diff -u -r1.303 article.sgml
> --- article.sgml	11 Sep 2011 18:04:15 -0000	1.303
> +++ article.sgml	15 Oct 2011 17:40:26 -0000
> @@ -304,9 +304,10 @@
>         <application>CVS</application>  but in Subversion.  The official
>         and exported trees are not necessarily equal.</para>
>
> -<note><para>Note that the<literal>www</literal>  module containing sources
> -      for the<ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink>  is
> -      contained within the<literal>doc</literal>  repository.</para></note>
> +<note><para>Note that the sources for the
> +<ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org">FreeBSD website</ulink>  are
> +      contained within the<literal>www</literal>  module of the
> +<literal>doc</literal>  repository.</para></note>
>
>       <para>The CVS repositories are hosted on the repository machines.
>         Currently, each of the repositories above reside on the same physical
>

Looks fine here, I'd say go ahead!

manolis@