TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons

[Denis Peplin]

Hello!

Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:33:57 +0400
> Denis Peplin <den at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hello!
>>
>>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>
>>>On 2004-10-15 13:44, Denis Peplin <den at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello!
>>>>
>>>>I have patch for this issue (attached), and keramida help
>>>>me to fix it English form.
>>>>
>>>>log:
>>>>Obtain some information from inetd(8) to fix "inetd"
>>>>description in network-servers chapter.
>>>>Add note about "daemon" term to "tcpwrappers" section
>>>>of security chapter.
>>>
>>>
>>>Ah, now that I see the log message...
>>>
>>>These two are really separate, a bit unrelated changes.  If you do
>>>commit the change to security/chapter.sgml do it in a second commit.
>>>This way the CVS log entry of each file contains text that is relevant
>>>to that file and not to some other, random stuff.
>>
>>ok, not a problem :)
> 
> 
> I just don't like to see a ton of note this and note that
> throughout the handbook.  It looks rather ugly and is overused
> in many cases as a replacement for rewriting the section to
> conform to all releases.  It's so much easier, IMO, to tag the
> handbook; however, that is not a fight I can win here.
> 
I hope, this is not fight with me :)
[attempt to joke above]

Yes, it so hard to fix all things, that really ugly.
As translator, I work with huge amount of text from handbook, and some
parts of it near to "too bad to translate".
But it is at least better than nothing :)

And, of course, you can commit another solution for issues,
discussed in this topic, w/o asking me.

> Please consider my rant as 'approved' so long as you do the
> separation requested by Giorgos; I agree with him here.
>