Making a dynamically-linked root
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at nsu.ru
Tue Jun 3 01:11:59 PDT 2003
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:58:46PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Gordon Tetlow writes:
> >
> > There will be a performance hit associated with this. I did a quick
> > measurement at boot and my boot time (from invocation of /etc/rc to
> > the login prompt) went from 12 seconds with a static root to 15
> > seconds with a dynamic root. I have yet to perform a worldstone on
> > it.
>
> Wow! That's a 25% pessimization. I'm afraid that other heavily
> scripted and or fork intensive environments may fair just as poorly
> (dynamic web content, SMTP servers, etc) as the startup scripts.
>
> I don't want to sound harsh, and I do appreciate your work. However,
> I think the last thing FreeBSD needs now is to get slower. We're
> already far slower than that other free OS. Shouldn't we consider
Can you show any evidence of how slow is RELENG_5 (and _4) compared to
those "other free OS"? Some folks make such statements occasionally,
but I haven't heard of any decent benchmarks from them. That would be
interesting to know though. Thank you.
./danfe
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list