[Fwd: Re: i386/112778: powerd is using sysctl
"dev.cpu.0.freq_levels" instead of correct(?)
"dev.est.0.freq_settings"]
Remko Lodder
remko at elvandar.org
Wed May 23 12:00:06 UTC 2007
Hi all,
I ment this to go to acpi@ instead of arch@ (apologies!): Can you have a
look at the idea of Tijl and see if that is something worth persueing?
Thanks,
remko
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: i386/112778: powerd is using sysctl "dev.cpu.0.freq_levels"
instead of correct(?) "dev.est.0.freq_settings"
From: "Tijl Coosemans" <tijl at ulyssis.org>
Date: Wed, May 23, 2007 1:10 pm
To: freebsd-i386 at FreeBSD.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following reply was made to PR i386/112778; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl at ulyssis.org>
To: bug-followup at freebsd.org, ggg_mail at inbox.ru
Cc:
Subject: Re: i386/112778: powerd is using sysctl "dev.cpu.0.freq_levels"
instead of correct(?) "dev.est.0.freq_settings"
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:31:04 +0200
You can set a lower bound with e.g. `sysctl debug.cpufreq.lowest=600`
Powerd doesn't have to be changed. I think it would be better to give
that sysctl a more official name like dev.cpu(.X).freq_lowest though,
but that's up to acpi@ not i386 at .
_______________________________________________
freebsd-i386 at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-i386
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-i386-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder ** remko at elvandar.org
FreeBSD ** remko at FreeBSD.org
/* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */
More information about the freebsd-acpi
mailing list