cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500.c ncr53c500_pccard.c ncr53c500hw.h ...

[Takahashi Yoshihiro]

In article <200403132113.05474.peter at wemm.org>
Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> writes:

> > > > >   Move the non-MD machine/dvcfg.h and machine/physio_proc.h to
> > > > > a common MI area before they proliferate more.
> > > >
> > > > Why these are in compat/netbsd?  These sure are obtained from
> > > > NetBSD/pc98, but not for compatible mode with NetBSD.
> > >
> > > Is there a better place?  I'd be happy to move them elsewhere..
> > > perhaps dev/pc98/*?  compat/pc98/*?
> >
> > These are also not for pc98 only.  I think that sys/sys is a better.
> 
> No, sys/sys is not a dumping ground for this kind of thing.  Now that 
> I've gone looking, I have just noticed sys/device_port.h - I am not 
> happy about that one being there either.  It doesn't appear to be in 
> NetBSD either.

How about sys/dev/*?  I can't think where is a good place..., but
it is sure that compat/netbsd is not a suitable place.

---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan at jp.FreeBSD.org>