cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/dev/ncv ncr53c500.c ncr53c500_pccard.c ncr53c500hw.h ...

[Peter Wemm]

On Saturday 13 March 2004 07:54 pm, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> In article <200403131948.20774.peter at wemm.org>
>
> Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> writes:
> > On Saturday 13 March 2004 07:32 pm, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> > > In article <200403131946.i2DJkRit022925 at repoman.freebsd.org>
> > >
> > > Peter Wemm <peter at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > peter       2004/03/13 11:46:27 PST
> > > >
> > > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > >
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     sys/compat/netbsd    dvcfg.h physio_proc.h
> > > >
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   Move the non-MD machine/dvcfg.h and machine/physio_proc.h to
> > > > a common MI area before they proliferate more.
> > >
> > > Why these are in compat/netbsd?  These sure are obtained from
> > > NetBSD/pc98, but not for compatible mode with NetBSD.
> >
> > Is there a better place?  I'd be happy to move them elsewhere..
> > perhaps dev/pc98/*?  compat/pc98/*?
>
> These are also not for pc98 only.  I think that sys/sys is a better.

No, sys/sys is not a dumping ground for this kind of thing.  Now that 
I've gone looking, I have just noticed sys/device_port.h - I am not 
happy about that one being there either.  It doesn't appear to be in 
NetBSD either.
-- 
Peter Wemm - peter at wemm.org; peter at FreeBSD.org; peter at yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5