cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl
Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile
ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/star Makefile
Mark Linimon
linimon at lonesome.com
Mon Apr 11 12:03:27 PDT 2005
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The first issue here is timing. As reminded in my original email
> there are not supposed to be any sweeping commits during the ports
> slush. The second issue is the amount of breakage that happened here
> due to untested changes and apparent lack of visual review of the diff
> prior to committing. I believe that most of that will be caught by a
> simple review of the diff, which you've probably completed already.
> I'll be happy for you to commit the rest of the changes after the
> slush ends, but for now we need to go back to a relatively clean
> slate.
I support this.
mcl
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list