Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alejandro,I'm not sure if you are aware that the discussion at a certain
> point has broadened and deepened. I don't understand why I can't propose
> an alternative to the actual jail and jail managers that you are talking
> about. And no. On the L4 website there is a userland based on new versions
> of Ubuntu and Debian that can be used with the microkernel offered. They
> also say that FreeBSD can be compiled,too,using the same technique used to
> build the Linux userland proposed. If you want to talk about containers,why
> not also add the microkernel topic,that's not a container,but its working
> can be compared to the microservices offered by Linux and FreeBSD if they
> run with a microkernel.
>
>
Never said you can't propose it, it just seems off-topic to this thread.
Maybe start a new thread on microkernel versus X.
This thread is about containers and container configuration, auto-scaling,
discovery, updating and monitoring, etc.

What I usually do in this case is start a new thread with a new subject and
(was: xxx).
That way, people interested in that branch of the discussion can continue
on its own topic, and the mail archives can do a better job for later
research.

BTW, I think what you are saying already exists and macOS is exactly that:
the FreeBSD core and the mach microkernel.

Best,

-- 
Alex