Re: breaking modules
- Reply: Ed Maste : "Re: breaking modules"
- In reply to: Ed Maste : "Re: breaking modules"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:43:22 UTC
29.04.2022 21:49, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 11:28, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: >> >> but that's crude. It's nice to be able to build most modules ready >> in case wanted later, so how about a DUDS env. mechanism like ports/ ? > > I'd rather not add additional complexity to our build infrastructure > to address a situation that shouldn't exist. Modules should build & > function on an ongoing basis (and, I believe they generally do). CI > doesn't report any issues on either stable branch or main at present. Unfortunately, CI does not catch stand-alone module build failures, out of kernel build directory. For example: if_em https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=c0460cf2e42d2819c1f191a1d6e1b3dc0c7ea010 if_epair https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=7a382e744b0b0ba9b51dc34bfa0cd1515f744f25 linuxkpi https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=f5a2e7b0e8483bf51519046fd149a6a31acef6b1