Re: breaking modules
- Reply: Eugene Grosbein : "Re: breaking modules"
- In reply to: Julian H. Stacey: "breaking modules"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:49:04 UTC
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 11:28, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > but that's crude. It's nice to be able to build most modules ready > in case wanted later, so how about a DUDS env. mechanism like ports/ ? I'd rather not add additional complexity to our build infrastructure to address a situation that shouldn't exist. Modules should build & function on an ongoing basis (and, I believe they generally do). CI doesn't report any issues on either stable branch or main at present.