Re: Docker
- Reply: M. Mader: "Re: Docker"
- In reply to: Hosney Osman : "Re: Docker"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 05:56:59 UTC
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:40:36 +0000 Hosney Osman <hosneybinosman@gmail.com> wrote: > great information for me is Jails and Bhyve alternative for Docker in > FreeBSD This is not the case! Jails are the FreeBSD equivalent of Linux containers (LXC). Byhve is the FreeBSD native hypervisor, it runs vms. The nearest things to docker are managers like iocage, bastille and cbsd. None of them provide the layered images approach to composing that docker uses which has led to the massive library of images and the plug and play simplicity (which comes at the price of not understanding your servers). They tend to use a package based approach to defining jails (which pretty much forces you to know all about your servers). > are there any alternative for kubernetes also No - there is nothing else like kubernetes and until recently it had a hard coded dependency on docker. That has now gone and a port of kubernetes to FreeBSD with support for jails as containers should be possible. The convenient plug and play distributed application component library is more difficult, but BastilleBSD may be a starting point (that would cast bastille into the role that docker plays on Linux for kubernetes). -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>