Re: Docker
- Reply: Tim Daneliuk : "Re: Docker"
- In reply to: Tim Daneliuk : "Re: Docker"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 16:40:39 UTC
I'm sure that Docker on freebsd can be implemented using partially the freebsd technology (under the hood) and partially the linux technology (out of the hood,like the syntax of the commands and copying its look and feel,I mean the pleasure of using it. At least I felt this pleasure and looking at how much popular Docker became during the years,I think that a lot of users felt that pleasure. To be honest I think that the jails are a more solid technology than the docker one,but they lack the same immediacy in knowing how to use them and ease of use. On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 6:35 PM Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote: > On 4/16/23 10:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 10:04 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> My point is that these extra pieces of tooling are not really "layers" > >> such much as ways to manage running containers at large scale. They > >> are not needed or recommend for smaller use cases. > > > > Hi, > > > > my apologies for my half-knowledge, I was probably a little too biased. > > I'm that biased since nowadays even Linux packages are often replaced by > > containers (snap, flatpak etc.). > > > > Regards, > > Ralf > > > > > > You might want to play around with that 'dockersand' tooling I wrote > linked in a prior message. It's a pretty painless way to experience > docker and has a lot of learning value, I think. > > -- Mario.