Re: Docker

From: Mario Marietto <marietto2008_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 16:40:39 UTC
I'm sure that Docker on freebsd can be implemented using partially the
freebsd technology (under the hood) and partially the linux technology (out
of the hood,like the syntax of the commands and copying its look and feel,I
mean the pleasure of using it. At least I felt this pleasure and looking at
how much popular Docker became during the years,I think that a lot of users
felt that pleasure. To be honest I think that the jails are a more solid
technology than the docker one,but they lack the same immediacy in knowing
how to use them and ease of use.



On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 6:35 PM Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote:

> On 4/16/23 10:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 10:04 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >> My point is that these extra pieces of tooling are not really "layers"
> >> such much as ways to manage running containers at large scale.  They
> >> are not needed or recommend for smaller use cases.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > my apologies for my half-knowledge, I was probably a little too biased.
> > I'm that biased since nowadays even Linux packages are often replaced by
> > containers (snap, flatpak etc.).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ralf
> >
> >
>
> You might want to play around with that 'dockersand' tooling I wrote
> linked in a prior message.  It's a pretty painless way to experience
> docker and has a lot of learning value, I think.
>
>

-- 
Mario.