Re: Docker

With this general attitude, full of firm convictions and systematic
stigmatization of other
people's ideas (when they aren't canonical), there is not enough space
for the emergence of
divergent ideas,ideas that can create innovation because they are able
to break thought
patterns became too static and historicised. It is a pity because in
order to develop,
progress needs to be nourished above all by unpopular and divergent ideas.
I'm not talking specifically about porting docker to FreeBSD, but I'm
talking about the way
you express your ideas, which, in my opinion, aren't dynamic and open
to changes and aren't
ready to welcome innovations that come from other systems such as
Linux, which always have
something that's wrong. Some of you demonize Linux too much and you
don't see the great
amount of innovations it has brought. I like both Linux and FreeBSD
and I am sad to read
that the latter is always used less in the industry. There may be
reasons, but few of you
seem to realize that some of them are inherent to their own views
about how FreeBSD
should be.


On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 9:32 PM Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net>
wrote:

> There are countless container approaches available under Linux. None of
> these approaches are mature and almost all, if not all, will be phased
> out before they are mature.
>
> I guess nobody wants to experience a Canonical and/or Google universe.
>
> Somewhere in the Internet I found "While Docker is a container runtime,
> Kubernetes is a platform for running and managing containers from many
> container runtimes".
>
> At next somebody will introduce a platform that does manage platforms
> for platforms. An energy turnaround looks way different.
>
>

-- 
Mario.